It happened in under 30 seconds, but it lingered for days. One minute I was giving a quick update in a team meeting, the next my manager cut in and said my “tone” was coming across as unprofessional. No examples, no context—just that word, delivered in front of everyone like a sticky note slapped on my forehead.
Then came the twist: later that afternoon, behind a closed door, the same manager told me I needed to speak up more. Be more visible. Be more proactive. Apparently I’m both “too much” and “not enough,” which is a neat trick if you can pull it off.
A whiplash moment a lot of people recognize
Workplace contradictions aren’t new, but this one hits a nerve because it mixes performance feedback with something squishier: personality. “Tone” is one of those words that can mean anything from “you sounded rushed” to “you made me uncomfortable because you were direct.” It can be real, or it can be a convenient umbrella for vague discomfort.
And telling someone to speak up more right after criticizing how they sound? That’s like telling a driver to go faster while you’re yanking the steering wheel. People don’t get louder when they feel policed—they get careful, and careful often looks like quiet.
What “unprofessional tone” usually means (and why it’s so slippery)
In many offices, “professional” is treated like a universal standard, but it’s often just a set of unwritten preferences. Some teams reward blunt clarity; others want everything wrapped in three layers of politeness and a bow. If no one ever spelled out the rules, you’re basically being graded on a rubric you didn’t receive.
“Tone” feedback can also be influenced by power dynamics. When a senior person is direct, it’s “leadership.” When a junior person is direct, it can suddenly become “attitude.” This doesn’t mean every tone comment is unfair, but it does mean the label is too easy to toss around without accountability.
The public call-out: why it stings more than the feedback itself
Even good feedback can feel awful when it’s delivered in front of an audience. A public correction changes the goal from “help you improve” to “signal control,” whether that’s the intention or not. It also teaches everyone else in the room what happens when you step out of line: you get tagged.
After a moment like that, people tend to replay every word they said. Was I too blunt? Too casual? Did I sound annoyed? The brain turns into a courtroom and you’re both defendant and jury, which is a terrible use of company time, but here we are.
The private follow-up: “speak up more” can be a trap
On its face, being told to speak up more sounds like encouragement. But when it’s paired with “and watch your tone,” it becomes a narrow hallway with walls that keep moving. Speak up—but not like that. Be confident—but not too confident. Participate—but don’t disrupt.
This kind of mixed message often shows up in cultures that value consensus on the surface but reward assertiveness behind the scenes. Managers want the benefits of your voice—ideas, initiative, ownership—without the discomfort that sometimes comes with actual candor.
So what do you do when you’re getting both messages at once?
First, it helps to treat this like a reporting problem, not a personality crisis. You need clarity, examples, and a shared definition of what “good” looks like. Without that, you’ll keep guessing, and guessing turns into self-censorship fast.
A straightforward way to start is to ask for specifics in writing or in a one-on-one, while the meeting is still fresh. Something like: “I want to make sure I’m aligned—can you share what I said or how I phrased it that came across as unprofessional?” If they can’t point to anything concrete, that tells you something important.
What better feedback would sound like (and what you can request)
Useful communication feedback is behavioral and situational. It sounds like: “When you said X, it landed as Y because the client was in the room,” or “In that meeting, we needed a summary first, then concerns.” It gives you something you can actually change, not a vibe to chase.
You can also ask for a model. “Can you give me an example of the tone you want in those moments?” is surprisingly powerful, because it turns an abstract critique into a measurable expectation. If your manager wants “more executive presence,” they should be able to describe what that looks like in words, not just feelings.
How to speak up more without walking into the tone tripwire
If you want to increase visibility while staying safe, structure is your friend. Try leading with a headline, then one or two supporting points, then a question: “My read is we’re at risk on timing because of X and Y. I think we should do Z. Does anyone see a blocker I’m missing?” It’s confident, clear, and hard to label as “tone-y” because it’s basically a mini-brief.
Another tactic: choose your moments. Speak early in meetings so you’re not fighting for space later, and aim for one solid contribution per topic rather than a running commentary. You’re not trying to win airtime; you’re trying to be consistently useful.
If you were singled out publicly, it’s okay to address that too
There’s a separate issue here: the delivery. If you feel comfortable, you can name it calmly: “I’m open to feedback, but I’d prefer it privately rather than in the group meeting. It threw me off, and I want to stay focused on the discussion.” That’s not being dramatic; it’s setting a basic working preference.
If your manager pushes back with “I was just being direct,” you can stay steady: “Direct works for me. I just want the setting to be one where I can absorb it and adjust without it turning into a moment in front of everyone.” Reasonable people usually hear that.
What this situation might be signaling about the team
Sometimes this is just a manager who’s inconsistent, rushed, or not great at coaching. But sometimes it’s a culture issue where “tone” is used to smooth over conflict rather than resolve it, and where certain people get more leeway than others. If you start noticing the pattern—who gets interrupted, who gets labeled “too intense,” who gets praised for saying the same thing—it’s worth paying attention.
Keep a simple record for yourself: date, meeting, what you said, what feedback you received, and any witnesses. Not because you’re gearing up for battle, but because memory gets fuzzy and patterns get clear when they’re written down. If you ever need to escalate or ask for support from HR, specifics matter.
The awkward part: sometimes you’re doing everything right
Here’s the quiet truth: you can be thoughtful, prepared, and respectful and still get hit with “tone” if someone doesn’t like the message—or doesn’t like hearing it from you. That’s frustrating, and it’s also not something you can fix with a softer voice alone. Communication skills are real, but so are biases and office politics.
If you want to test the waters, ask for a short follow-up plan: “For the next two meetings, I’ll give my update in a headline-first format and flag risks with a proposed solution. Can we check in afterward so you can tell me if that’s landing the way you want?” That turns vague criticism into a measurable experiment, which is about as close to sanity as you can get in a workplace contradiction.
More from Willow and Hearth:
Leave a Reply