If the PTO Act becomes law, millions of people could gain about two extra weeks of paid annual leave — effectively giving many nearly an extra workweek off each year. This change would guarantee at least 80 hours of paid time off for full-time employees, closing a gap that now leaves about 27 million workers without paid annual leave.
They’ll want to know who qualifies, how the leave accrues, and what employers must do to comply. The article will walk through the bill’s key provisions, who stands to benefit, and how this would shift paid-leave expectations across the country.
The Protected Time Off Act: Key Details and Eligibility
The PTO Act would require employers to provide a set amount of paid annual leave that employees can use for any reason. It sets accrual rates, caps, timing rules, and basic protections so workers keep pay when they take vacation days.
What the PTO Act Proposes
The bill, officially called the Protected Time Off Act (PTO Act), mandates paid annual leave separate from sick leave and family leave. Employers must give at least 1 hour of paid annual leave for every 25 hours worked, which amounts to roughly two weeks (up to 80 hours) for full-time employees over a 12-month period.
The law treats paid annual leave as general-use PTO—paid vacation time or paid personal leave—that employees may spend without explaining the reason. Employers may set reasonable scheduling limits and deny requests for bona fide business reasons, but must offer alternative times.
Who Would Be Eligible for More Paid Time Off
Covered employees include most workers employed by entities engaged in commerce who work for an employer that averaged at least one employee across 20 or more workweeks in the current or prior year. The bill explicitly covers federal entities like the Library of Congress and the Government Accountability Office and includes tipped employees and many state and federal workers.
Part-time employees earn leave pro rata under the 1 hour per 25 hours rule; overtime-exempt employees are deemed to work 40 hours per week for accrual purposes. Small employers that meet the coverage threshold and public agencies defined under the Fair Labor Standards Act are also included.
How Paid Time Off Would Be Accrued and Used
Accrual begins at hire: employees start earning paid annual leave immediately at the stated rate. Workers can generally use accrued leave starting on day 60 of employment unless an employer allows earlier use or loans leave in advance.
The Act caps accrual at 80 hours per 12-month period and allows up to 40 unused hours to carry into the next 12 months. Pay during leave equals the worker’s regular rate; tipped workers receive at least the applicable minimum wage while on paid vacation. Employers may require up to two weeks’ notice but cannot demand more, and they cannot force employees to find coverage as a condition of taking paid time off.
How the PTO Act Changes Paid Leave in America
The PTO Act would guarantee at least 80 hours of paid annual leave per year, let employees use that time for any reason, and set rules for earning, carryover, and payout at separation. It also clarifies employer scheduling rights and limits on requiring employees to disclose reasons or find replacements.
Current Paid Leave Laws vs. Proposed Changes
Federal law currently does not require private employers to provide paid vacation. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) guarantees unpaid leave for certain family and medical needs, but it does not require pay. The PTO Act would add a federal floor: employees earn 1 hour of paid annual leave for every 25 hours worked, up to 80 hours per 12-month period, and begin earning at hire.
The bill preserves paid-sick and paid-family-leave protections and excludes those categories from “paid annual leave.” It requires employers to compensate leave at the employee’s regular rate and allows loaned leave subject to reimbursement at separation. Employers may deny leave scheduling for a bona fide business reason but must offer reasonable alternative times.
Comparisons to Europe and State Policies
Most European countries mandate several weeks of paid vacation plus statutory paid family leave; the PTO Act narrows that gap but does not match European levels. The Act’s two-week minimum aligns with common U.S. proposals rather than continental standards.
Several U.S. states and cities already require paid leave or paid sick time, and some have more generous paid family leave programs. The PTO Act would create a federal baseline that cannot reduce more generous contractual or state protections, preserving collective-bargaining benefits. That means workers in states with stronger policies keep them, while millions in states without mandates would gain guaranteed paid annual leave.
Who’s Pushing for the Legislation
Representatives including Seth Magaziner, Nikki Budzinski, Greg Casar, and Jasmine Crockett introduced the House bill, backed by a group of congressional Democrats. Senator Bernie Sanders has pushed companion Senate efforts and broader workplace reforms such as a 32-hour workweek, connecting paid time-off proposals to a larger legislative agenda.
Advocates emphasize expanding time off to roughly 27 million private-sector workers currently without paid vacation. Business groups warn about administrative and labor-cost impacts, while unions and worker advocates cite recruitment, retention, and public-health benefits. The bill has bipartisan procedural hurdles in the House and Senate but clear sponsorship among House Democrats.
Broader Impact on Workers and Employers
Workers would gain predictable paid time off usable for rest, caregiving, appointments, or errands. The law prohibits employers from forcing employees to disclose reasons or find replacements, and it allows carryover of up to 40 unused hours into the next year. Paid time would be paid at the regular rate; tipped workers receive at least the applicable minimum wage while on leave.
Employers would need new tracking, payroll, and scheduling rules and might face higher labor costs, especially for small businesses. The bill allows reasonable scheduling restrictions and denial for bona fide business reasons, which gives firms operational flexibility. Collective bargaining agreements that provide better leave remain intact, so unionized workplaces generally see little change in benefits.
More from Willow and Hearth:
Leave a Reply