In a large American law firm, one employee faces an unusual dilemma: an enormous mural displaying portraits of iconic figures, including Anne Frank, hangs in the office. For her, walking past Frank’s image every day is more than just a minor inconvenience; it’s a painful reminder of her family’s history as Holocaust survivors. Seeking to address her discomfort, this employee grappled with whether she could request the company replace or paint over the portrait of Frank, who symbolizes the trauma and legacy of the Holocaust.
Originally posted in late October 2025, the employee described the mural as an extensive collage that spans multiple walls of the office. Each life-sized portrait is accompanied by quotes from historical figures, celebrities, and world leaders. The situation became particularly uncomfortable for her as she needed to pass by Frank’s likeness, situated eye-level and just inches away, to access essential areas of the office, like the kitchen and the supply room. “This is the first time I’ve ever experienced something to be so triggering,” she expressed, acknowledging the generational trauma resulting from her family’s Holocaust experiences.
As she tried to navigate her feelings, she considered whether it would be reasonable to ask her firm to either paint over Frank’s image or replace it with someone else. While she believed that the partners would be sympathetic to her plight, especially given her connection to the subject matter, uncertainty about how to approach the conversation loomed large. The tension escalated as she weighed her professional reputation at the new firm against her emotional discomfort.
Fast forward nearly eight months, and the employee revisited her original feelings about the mural. After much reflection and engaging with comments from an online forum, she found herself reconsidering her stance. Many readers, particularly those who identified as Jewish, pointed out that removing Frank’s portrait could trigger distress among other colleagues and potentially lead to public relations pitfalls for the firm. “I never considered that perspective, and it completely changed my thinking,” she acknowledged. Ultimately, the employee decided against raising the issue with her employers, realizing that she would rather not disturb a symbol so vital to many others who share her heritage.
As a coping mechanism, she adopted a darkly humorous approach to the situation. She began to refer to Anne Frank as “my esteemed colleague” and “my work bestie,” which allowed her to reclaim her daily commute through the office in a light-hearted way. This shift in attitude sparked conversations among her coworkers about the mural itself, revealing that many found the inclusion of various historical figures to be somewhat arbitrary and even inappropriate.
Some colleagues raised eyebrows at the creative but questionable choices in the mural. One remarked on the absurdity of having Frank as the sole Jewish representation among a crowd of others, while another pointed out the inconsistency in the portrayal of historical figures, such as questioning the inclusion of characters like Walt Disney. These discussions underscored a broader critique of the mural and its relevance—or lack thereof—within the workspace.
The employee reflected on the humorous and complex dynamics that emerged from her discomfort, noting that the mural has become a topic of engagement among staff, prompting a mix of amusement and contemplation about legacy and representation in the workplace. She expressed hope that, if the firm ever updates its décor, the focus will shift away from controversial figures to more neutral designs that foster a more comfortable working environment for everyone.
In a setting where a seemingly simple artwork can evoke a web of emotions and conversations, this employee continues to navigate the challenges posed by her office mural with both humor and understanding. The unresolved tension surrounding the mural remains, leaving everyone to ponder the intersections of history, memory, and corporate culture.
More from Willow and Hearth:
Leave a Reply